FDA warns meals companies about seafood and import violations

As a part of its enforcement actions, the Meals and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities beneath its jurisdiction. Some letters should not posted for public view till weeks or months after they’re despatched. Enterprise house owners have 15 days to answer FDA warning letters. Warning letters usually should not issued till an organization has been given months to years to appropriate issues. The FDA often redacts components of warning letters posted for public view.


J & L USA Inc.
Commerce, CA

An import firm in California is on discover from the FDA for not having FSVPs for a variety of imported meals merchandise.

In an April 30 warning letter, the FDA described a Jan.19, 2021, distant International Provider Verification Program (FSVP) inspection for J & L USA Inc. The FDA’s inspection revealed that the agency was not in compliance with FSVP laws and resulted within the issuance of an FDA Type 483a.

The agency’s important violations of the FSVP regulation are as follows:

The agency didn’t develop, preserve, and comply with an FSVP. Particularly, the agency didn’t develop an FSVP for any of the meals they import, together with however not restricted to, the next meals:

  1. Inexperienced Tea imported from (redacted), situated in (redacted)
  2. Dried Bamboo Leaf imported from (redacted), situated in (redacted)
  3. Dried White Fungus imported from (redacted), situated in (redacted)
  4. Rock Sweet imported from (redacted), situated in (redacted)
  5. Brown Sweet in Items imported from (redacted), situated in (redacted)

The total warning letter will be considered right here.

Martinez Produce & Seafood Inc
Chicago, IL

A meals agency in Chicago is on discover from the FDA for violations of the seafood Hazard Evaluation and Vital Management Level (HACCP) regulation.

In an April 28 warning letter, the FDA described a Jan. 5 by means of 14, 2021,  inspection at Martinez Produce & Seafood Inc.’s seafood processing facility and importer institution. FDA inspectors discovered critical violations of the seafood Hazard Evaluation and Vital Management Level (HACCP) regulation, ensuing within the issuance of an FDA Type 483.

The agency’s important violations are as follows:

  1. The agency should conduct or have performed for them a hazard evaluation for every sort of fish and fishery product that they produce to find out whether or not there are meals security hazards which might be moderately prone to happen and so they will need to have and implement a written HACCP plan to regulate any meals security hazards which might be moderately prone to happen. Nonetheless, the agency doesn’t have a HACCP Plan for contemporary tuna and salmon in lowered oxygen packaging to regulate the hazard of Clostridium botulinum development and toxin formation, distributed on to customers by means of on-line gross sales. Particularly, FDA investigators noticed the processing of small parts of tuna which had been vacuum packed in lowered oxygen packaging (ROP) for distribution. When requested if the agency had a HACCP plan for ROP processed seafood, their worker said the agency didn’t at present have a HACCP plan for ROP fin fish.

The FDA has reviewed their corrective motion of discontinuing the apply of vacuum packaging their contemporary seafood, together with contemporary tuna and salmon merchandise. Of their response, the agency states that they now use (redacted) freezer baggage to bundle their contemporary seafood. If carried out appropriately, this corrective motion must be ample to deal with the hazard of Clostridium botulinum development and toxin formation.

  1. The agency should implement an affirmative step which ensures that the fish and fishery merchandise they import are processed in accordance with the seafood HACCP regulation. Nonetheless, the agency doesn’t have nor has carried out an affirmative step for Tuna (imported from (redacted)), mackerel (imported from (redacted)), and Flounder fish (imported from (redacted)). Particularly, when FDA investigators requested to assessment their affirmative step paperwork, their worker said they didn’t at present have an import verification program. As well as, the identical worker said they had been unfamiliar with their suppliers’ operations and would not have any data for the management of hazards within the seafood merchandise imported from their suppliers.

The FDA has reviewed their corrective motion which included the creation of a “International Provider HACCP USA-FDA Compliance Type”, requesting suppliers to supply the date of their final FDA inspection, certification that they’re following GMPs, and SSOPs, in addition to, their most present “USA-Compliant” HACCP plan. 

  1. The agency should monitor circumstances and practices throughout processing with ample frequency to make sure conformance with present good manufacturing apply necessities, which might be acceptable to their plant and the meals being processed and associated to one of many areas laid out in 21 CFR 123.11(b)(1) — (8). Nonetheless, the agency didn’t monitor the next circumstances and practices with ample frequency to make sure compliance.
  2. a) The agency didn’t monitor circumstances and practices with ample frequency to make sure that they clear and sanitize their utensils or tools in a fashion that protects towards contamination. Particularly, FDA investigators noticed their cleansing and sanitization of knives used to chop ready-to-eat blue fin tuna. The agency’s worker dipped the knives in a (redacted) resolution, wiped the answer off, after which positioned the knives right into a smaller gray plastic container stuffed with a (redacted) As soon as positioned within the gray plastic container, the knives are thought of prepared to be used. No detergent was used throughout cleansing. Seen residual meals particles was noticed on the knives after their cleansing and sanitizing actions.
  3. b) The agency didn’t monitor circumstances and practices with ample frequency to make sure that efficient measures are taken to guard completed meals from contamination. Particularly, FDA investigators noticed cleansing operations within the refrigerated processing room the place entire, ready-to-eat blue fin tuna and open packing containers of ready-to-eat salmon had been saved. A number of workers had been noticed utilizing high-pressure hoses to take away particles from meals contact surfaces, the ground, and the ground drains adjoining to the ready-to-eat tuna and salmon.

The total warning letter will be considered right here.

(To join a free subscription to Meals Security Information, click on right here.)

Source link

ndy